Dromeosaurs are one of the last dinosaur groups to really
become superstars. In the 80s, Deinonychus was the most popular dinosaur: a
unique sprinter, jumper, kicker, gangster. A well-armed social hunter,
Deinonychus mobbing and dismembering their prey became a defining image of the
new “hot blood” look of dinosaurs as science finally came to terms with
dinosaur endothermy. When Michael
Crichton gave them the name of Velociraptor and Steven Spielberg put them on
screen in the most terrifying depiction of any dinosaur, they became
superstars.
Immediately after the release of the film, a new giant
dromaeosaur was discovered: Utahraptor. Utahraptor showed that Deinonychus was
no longer the earliest or largest dromaeosaur. Earlier dromaeosaurs have since
been found, but not larger ones. At over 1,000 lbs, Utahraptor remains the
largest (and most famous) of the dromaeosaurs. In the 2010s, a new giant raptor
has made headlines. Extremely rare, Dakotaraptor finally allows for the fantasy
“Utahraptor meets Tyrannosaurus” scenarios dinosaur fans have dreamed of for 20
years.
But there are two other giant raptors, two big dromaeosaurs
that have been found and ignored by popular culture. One I will deal with later
along with its family, but today I will talk about Velociraptor’s giant
predecessor in Mongolia: Achillobator.
In 1989 a Soviet-Mongolian expedition was collecting in Burkhant, Dornogovi, part of the Bayan Shireh
formation. This mysterious expedition (nothing on it exists on this side of the
paywall) collected turtles, fragments of sauropods, azdarchid pterosaurus, and
a mysterious new theropod. This theropod was a disarticulated fragmentary
skeleton-left maxilla with teeth, 11 vertebrae, bits of rib, a scapula and coracoid,
the right half of the pelvis, a radius,, a left femur and tibia, and an
incomplete foot and hand.
10 years later, increased Mongolian ties with the American
Museum of Natural History caused their leading dinosaur paleontologists Mark
Norell and Jim Clark to examine the remains together with the great Mongolian
paleontologist Altangerel Perle. They
concluded it was a new dromaeosaur-a big one, the biggest one since Utahraptor.
They named it Achillobator: Achillo- refers to the large heel but also works
with the -bator. Achilles was also the Greek hero that the heel was named
after, while bataar/baattur is Mongolian for hero.
Achillobator was unusual for Mongolian dromaeosaurs. Other
species like Adasaurus and Velociraptor were much smaller, and similar to the
North American species like Dromaeosaurus and Deinonychus. The pelvis is
shockingly different-the pubis is like that of a Tyrannosaur, jutting straight
down with a large “boot” at the end, while all other dromaeosaurs have a
birdlike pubis that curves along with the ischium. A team of theropod workers
including Burnham, Ostrom, Bakker, Currie, Zhou and Destier considered it a
possible chimera in their paper on Bambiraptor.
Norell took their criticisms in hand and further examination proved him
right-Some of the bones were still articulated, the bones were of the same
color, and every cladistic analysis he and Mackovicky applied still kept
Achillobator as a dromaeosaur, no matter how primitive the pelvis was.
Aside from the pelvis, Achillobator is unique in terms of
size. Other dromaeosaurs of the region-Adasaurus, Velociraptor,
Luanchuanraptor, Zhenyuanglong, etc, were only about 2 meters in length and
less than 20 kg. Judging by the known material of Achillobator and comparing it
to those relatives, the animal could have been as long as 6 meters and 350 kg.
This would make it larger than Austroraptor, about the same size as
Dakotaraptor and second only to the 500 kg Utahraptor. In build, it’s more robust than Dakotaraptor,
but still not as robust as Utahraptor.
As a Dromaeosaur, Achillobator would have had a full coat of
plumage, even on the tip of the tail and with nonfunctional wings. It would have a long snout full of curved,
serrated teeth, long talons on the hand, and a single giant talon on each foot.
The tail would be long and stiff, and the legs and neck flexible and agile.
Dromaeosaurs were not as cursorial as
other coelurosaurs, but maneuverable and agile, built for quick motions,
ducking, dodging, leaping. Achillobator itself has a longer femur than tibia,
and may not have been agile as even Dakotaraptor. Paleoartist Mark Witton has an intriguing
speculation that Achillobator could have been a badger-like digger hunting
mammals and small ornithiscians (art below)
The use of the hand and foot claws has been debated: they
could have been used for stabbing, slashing, climbing, or nothing at all.
Unfortunately, the foot claws of Achillobator are missing. Using Dakotaraptor
as a model, the inner toe claw would be 6 inches long.
Achillobator is a dromeosaurine-in Dromeosaurinae, it is
more derived than the earlier Deinonychus and later Atrociraptor, but still
less derived than the earlier Utahraptor and later Dromaeosaurus and
Dakotaraptor. Dromaeosaurinae is defined
by boxier, wider skulls, teeth serrated on both sides, and shorter and more
powerful legs for jumping rather than running.
Dating Achillobator is difficult: the Bayan Shireh formation
stretches 98 to 83 million years, 15 million years in length. Why this
formation is so difficult to date is unclear-it seems to be a problem with the
amount of magnetic material, Potassium, Argon, Lead and Uranium in the rock, as
well as the deposition of the strata itself.
This 15 million years encompasses
4 geologic ages: The Cenomanian, Turonian, Coniacian and Santonian. This is a
general problem with other Mongolian Strata: The overlying Iren Dabasu
formation ranged from 85 to 70 million years ago. So the two species assigned
to Alectrosaurus may prove to either be the same, or belong to Tyrannosaurs
separated by 30 million years.
The Bayan Shireh is similar in environment to the
contemporary wetlands-The Moreno Hill, Upper Cedar Mountain and Wahwheap
Formations in North America, the
Bahariya formation in Africa, and the Candeleros, Lissandro, Portezuelo and
Bajo de La Carpa Formations in South
America. The upper Cretaceous for the most part was very wet, only with some
parts of Mongolia and the Americas drying out in deserts in the Campanian.
Achillobator was one of the main predators of the ecosystem,
sharing the role with the small Tyrannosaur Alectrosaurus. Alectrosaurus’ close
anatomical similarities in both the Bayan Shireh and Iren Dabsu indicates
possibly a later date for the Bayan Shireh, closer to 80 mya than 100. Prey would have consisted of the undescribed
sauropod’s young, the small ceratopsians Graciloceratops and Microceratus, the
Therizinosaurs Erlikosaurus, Enigmosaurus, and Segnosaurus, the Ornithomimid Garudrimimus, and probably
early Hadrosauromorphs and Oviraptors. The environment also contained azdarchid
pterosaurs and the ankylosaurs Talarurus, Tsagantegia and Maleevus.
Hopefully more of the Bayan Shireh and Achillobator in
particular will be found. It’s this mystery that prevents it from reaching the
fame of the even bigger Utahraptor, and the “contemporary-with-T.rex”
Dakotaraptor, let alone the complete Velociraptor and Deinonychus. The late
date of discovery doesn’t help either-while it would fit the size of the
“Velociraptor” in Jurassic Park, Deinonychus was the species referred to in the
novel and Velociraptor in the film and publicity material. Achillobator is one of the many dromaeosaurs
overshadowed by the main 5 genera in pop culture, especially since the Bayan
Shireh isn’t particularly diverse or late, with smaller animals than South
America, in a country without the media
of North America.
So anyway,
Hollywood, give this guy a break. Museums, put him on display. Toy companies,
here’s a new fresh face. Authors, think about the crap you’re writing and how
this genus could perk up the place. And remember, shop Achillobator where you
work or play.
Fast cash offer for you today at just 3% interest rate, both long and short term cash of all amounts and currencies, no collateral required. Apply now for your instant approval financialserviceoffer876@gmail.com WhatsApp +918929509036
ReplyDeleteThanks for supporting the idea of 360 degree feedback. I’ve seen it create division in senior teams when handled incorrectly and seen transformation happen when used elegantly. It’s all about the intention and skill of those who facilitate the process.
ReplyDeletekid Adventure